Comments on: Why We Won’t Be Microchipped

By: Heidi Paulus

Heidi Paulus — Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:32:28 +0000

I enjoyed reading this article, It is against my rights and religion to have this, and I am wondering if this might be the mark of the antichrist.

By: Mark Mina

Mark Mina — Mon, 13 Jul 2020 04:57:18 +0000

Of course they will not inject a microchip via inoculation… It is too obvious.

Rather… they may enforce a quantum dot tattoo that is scan-able (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg–VIL2I6Y) where said tattoo is updated with every vaccine injection according to a schedule where you cannot engage in commerce of any kind without the latest tattoo.

Said tattoo would be scan-able and as such the data scanned would be the result of a blockchain hash (series of computations -> cryptosystem) that can be compared with the latest schedule. #id2020 and other RFPs are predicated on this idea. In essence one may not be able to buy or sell save without the “latest” impression. Neato huh!?!?!

https://www.sciencealert.com/an-invisible-quantum-dot-tattoo-is-being-suggested-to-id-vaccinated-kids
http://news.rice.edu/2019/12/18/quantum-dot-tattoos-hold-vaccination-record/ https://savedmag.com/bill-gates-quantum-dot-digital-tattoo-implant-to-track-covid-19-vaccine-compliance/
https://id2020.org/
https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-blockchain-id2020

By: deborah Pendleton

deborah Pendleton — Wed, 08 Jul 2020 14:50:16 +0000

what your article says about chips is pure semantics to what the technology actually is. and for that reason your article does great harm

By: deborah Pendleton

deborah Pendleton — Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:10:47 +0000

In reply to Jeremiah. it's an ignorant article.

By: deborah Pendleton

deborah Pendleton — Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:05:54 +0000

“This is why the UN’s legal identity agenda prioritizes speaking with one voice, not providing confusing or conflicting information to member states, and supporting the efforts of the World Bank. The unified message delivered includes the importance of unified systems, and Williams holds up the Egyptian identity system, in which a single unique number identifies each individual from birth to death, as an example for developing systems. This allows the identifier to be used often, for a range of different government services and programs, but also early, for programs UNICEF is involved in, such as vaccinations.”

By: EMILIA

EMILIA — Mon, 06 Jul 2020 19:06:25 +0000

I agree that the conspiracy surrounding this is mistaken about the use and technology of the microchip. Yet, we should be even more concerned to avoid the chip for the purpose of making monetary payments! While some are concerned to save their lives, the real concern is to save ones soul and not take the very near coming Mark of the Beast, where no man can buy or sell saving those who have this Mark. This is a sin against faith.

By: Donna

Donna — Wed, 01 Jul 2020 12:20:56 +0000

Michigan passed a bill to make it illegal for companies to require a microchip for employees.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8472435/New-Michigan-law-makes-illegal-companies-force-workers-implanted-microchips.html

By: Jeremiah

Jeremiah — Wed, 01 Jul 2020 01:55:40 +0000

This is a good article. I wish it was completely unnecessary but people have become paranoid.