Agree with you

The solution is not so much “to be careful accepting the Fathers’ writings” (which would imply a certain distrust…) but not to single out sentences from their writings (which were meant to expose the Christian faith to their contemporaries in categories they could understand and terms familiar to them) and think they have the same eternal value than the words of the Gospel.
One has to consider the whole book or work : when was it written ? for what purpose ? which are the people it was adressed to and their ideas etc., and then try to catch the whole of the argument not just an isolated sentence which does not give justice to the thought of the Father…a:

The article shows that some fathers have similar ideas. However, this suggestion was never accepted by the Church. That means that we have to be carefull accepting fathers’ writings